Archive for June, 2009

Heaven’s Embrace

Sunday, June 28th, 2009

(c) Sunday, June 28, 2009

A dog curled in a ball

surrounded by the half-moon

of his shin and instep

rising and falling with a tide-like breath

 

A cat laying in the crook of his arm

head on his shoulder

paw draping lazily over his huddled arm

quietly purring

like a far-off motorcycle

carrying her passenger

into the distant unknown

 

A woman sleeping by his side

calm and quiet

beauty uncontained by any tension or posturing

whether awake or asleep

her love covers him

like a thick blanket

 

A man lying with eyes open

body at rest

looking from one sleeping saint to the next

smiling softly

as his eyes close

in Heaven’s embrace

Adam Lambert Is Gay!

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

I just can't believe he's not straight!        

I just can’t believe he’s not straight!

OH…MY…GOD! I saw the headline that said that the American Idol runner-up, who most everyone—including all the judges—thought should win, announced that he was gay. The last time I was so affected by news like this, was when I read that 250,000 people had died in a tsunami or our military had killed 1,000,000 innocent Iraqis in an unprovoked war or told by the person who I had believed I would spend the rest of my life with, “I feel nothing for you anymore. Time to go.” I had handled all these devastations, bounced back from the knockdown and came up punching. But this shocker is more than this frail human being can take. It is the straw that broke the camel’s back, the tortoise that beat the rabbit, the elephant that left his footprint in the peanut butter. I think I will go catatonic and spend the rest of my days sitting on my couch, eating from a family size bag of chips and a gallon container of a liquid that can dissolve a tooth soaked in it for 24-hours and praying for the trans-fatty acids to not only destroy my body but to destroy my memory of the horrid day I read the headline that Adam Lambert had announced that he is gay.

Now let’s take a look at this guy. He hair is dyed black and combed in a way that no self-respecting straight man would be able to pull off without ruining it by bursting into hysterics when they raised the glass dome from his head at the hair salon, causing it to fall out like an upside-down cake exposed to too much noise. His finger nails are painted with black polish, which may be the resulting mess of instead of using Wite-Out to cover mistakes, using Blak-out to cover all the things he finds offensive, such as any mention of sports, drinking beer or kissing girls. His voice is a little high and lilty, his hips move a little fruity and swishy and he seems to admire fashion, poofy dogs and cock. But if none of this added up to anything conclusive, the trump card is that he comes from musical theater and only queers and steers come from musical theater “and you don’t look like no steer to me, boy!” [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyFSdj1J5Vw]

Singing Queen or being a queen?

Singing Queen or being a queen?

I think the headline should have read:

“ADAM LAMBERT SAYS HE’S GAY—NO SHIT!”

This all is as shocking as when my hairdresser seemed to have a bulge in the back of his pants and I asked him, “Renaldo, did you just take a dump in your pants?” and he responded, “Oh, Heaven’s no! It’s just the dildo my boyfriend shoved in my ass from last night,” to which I followed with, “Wait a sec—are you gay?” If our media followed the same pre-emptive “Start Wars With Any Country That Commits A Thought Crime” strategy then the headlines for weeks preceding the “startling” headline would have been:

“ADAM LAMBERT—WHEN IS HE GOING TO ADMIT HE’S A FAG??”

Unlike Clay Aiken, I have nothing against Adam Lambert [http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/05/22/2009-05-22_contr.html]Nor do I have anything against gays—in fact, I’ve gotten my best blowjobs from men of gaiety. I have a little issue with the moronic media creating news out of nonsense and the dumbed down public who reads it and thinks to themselves, “My life would not be complete if I hadn’t read this tripe!”

Will the real "Fruity Pebbles" please stand up?

Will the real "Fruity Pebbles" please stand up?

That’s not entirely true what I said. I do have a problem with gays. It’s not the swish-swish of their walks or the fact that they dress more fashionably than me or can turn a dumpty one-bedroom apartment into a “FABulous” pad. It is because they have allowed a bigoted, oppressive society to allow keep them hiding who they are and how they want to be.

The Incredible Hulk or the Excessively "Jolly" Green Giant

The Incredible Hulk or the Excessively "Jolly" Green Giant

I’m not saying this will be easy, faggots. You’ll take a lot of shit for coming out of the closet. But what do you do when you take your dick out of your boyfriend’s ass—you wipe it off and it’s up and ready to be sucked once again. So what would happen if all of the Hollywood closet queens and Wall Street business blowers and the high-priced cocksuckers in law (meaning that not only are they pricks but they also suck them as well) and firefighting fags and military fruitcakes (with all the wars we’re starting, would the military really kick out someone who just wants to cuddle a little in the foxhole?) came out and said:

“WE’RE GAY AS HELL—BUT NOT THAT ICKY HELL WITH WAY TOO MUCH RED TO BE FASHIONABLE—AND WE’RE NOT GOING TO HIDE ANYMORE!”

"Do you like the spread I laid out for you?"

"Do you like the spread I laid out for you?"

I’ll tell you what would happen. There would be uproar from the Christian Right politicians who are gay as a semen facemask treatment overcompensating with outward bravado while underneath their power suits they’re wearing crotchless panties. But the newly created Anal-Fisting Lobby would counter this outlash by seeing to it that any of those Bohemian Grove attending, running around naked and having sex with gay male prostitute leaders of the “free” world would be outed if they didn’t play ball—as opposed to just playing with balls behind closed doors.

In the Hollywood studios, where money and subliminal programming of the masses is all that matters, there would be discussion in the boardrooms about whether the public would now accept a leading man who would be kissing the buxom beauties on camera and off-camera would be riding the baloney pony. The discussion would end promptly when gayboy Tom Cruise contacted his cult of Scientology to use their Harassment Division to make the lives of the Hollywood Executives miserable, tying them up with lawsuits for so long that soon they would only be able to get their morning double-latte six days a week instead of seven—which would be too much for them and they would cave.

He's singing--not showing how to give head!

He's singing--not showing how to give head!

On Wall Street no one would care which genital organs one liked to put in his mouth, as long as they can manipulate the public with hype and fear and put away enough money in their personal accounts to make even Bernie Madoff jealous.

Would you lose friends? No, you wouldn’t—because any person whose “friendship” is based on you living a lie is no friend. In fact, you’d probably make even more friends, as you’d be invited to a lot more circle-jerks and Jiz-on-the-Cracker parties.

I joke, but the truth is that our sole responsibility in this incarnation is to proudly live our Authentic Selves. This doesn’t mean you say whatever pops into your head at the expense of everyone around you. “You look fat in that dress. Hey, I’m just being true to myself.” That’s not authenticity; that’s more masquerading hiding your True Self.

And being gay or straight is not who you really are either. It might be how you express Who You Are but that has little to do with Who You Are. When you wake up in the morning, or from your deep sleep of savasana in a yoga class, is the first thought that comes to mind, “I am a gay man ready to take the day!” or “I am a Christian. Praise Jesus!” No, it is just “I am.” And that’s enough.

Uh, mouth-to-mouth resuscitation? Alright, he's gay.

Uh, mouth-to-mouth resuscitation? Alright, he's gay.

Maybe one day we will all be happy with just “I AM” and not have to put curtains up to make it accept it. Maybe we will see that “I AM” is not ugly—despite all the lies the priest, politicians, parents, media, Hollywood and Madison Avenue has vomited on it—and is not in need of curtains to enhance it in any way. If you’re gay, it will be hard not to interior decorate, I know. I’m telling you, when you get rid of all the floral patterns and the “loveseat that converts into a coffee table,” what’s left in the empty room is pure beauty. Not gay beauty. Not straight beauty. Not Christian beauty. Jewish beauty. Moslem beauty. Doctor beauty. Lawyer beauty. Rich beauty. Poor beauty. Just “I AM” beauty.

But this will require us all to “Tom Cruise, come out of the closet,” [http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/155090], for us to stop playing with our balls with our butt buddies and start showing some balls by being proud of Who We Are.

who I am

Monday, June 22nd, 2009

(c) June 22, 2009

i am not sure

but i believe

that who I am

i can conceive

created with my own desire

and ignited with my passion’s fire

 

or perhaps I’ve come

already packaged

the bow and wrapping

are just the snackage

open the box

inside’s the meal

already prepared

the Me that’s real

 

do i grow

or just discover

is there a choice

or just a cover

am I a fighter

or a lover

are You against me

or my brother

is there a God

or no other

 

it’s a mystery

who I am

will i find out

i hope i can

i’ve searched all over

become a man

i’ve looked within

i haven’t ran

 

perhaps one day

i’ll know God’s plan

and then i’ll rest

know who I am

Swami X Eats His Dog!

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

My little girl, reckless "Abandon"   

My little reckless "Abandon"

I went to a booth at the Yoga & Raw Food Expo that was selling a bunch of Indian-looking clothes and necklaces to see if they could repair the fancy-dancy mala necklace I bought in India that had broken when I pulled it over my head in a rush to get to yoga class in order to slow down. I was told by Sky that he could restring it for $25. I was like, “$25?” less because I’m losing my hearing and more because I was like, “Just to thread some beads on a string and tie it—screw that!” He told me that he would say the special mala necklace mantra, as if I gave a shit about superstition.

I decided not to get it repaired but instead enjoyed about an hour and a half of discussion on yogic philosophy with Sky, chatting about how yoga can be applied to deeper things in life. I liked Sky and enjoyed the fact that he didn’t seem like one of those people who are like, “What are you talking about? Isn’t yoga is just for fitness?” He did bug me a few times with what I perceived as possibly trying to join me in the coolness of my personal swami pool, which I took more like he was peeing in it.

The first, “Brutha please!” occurred when he said—whether it was actual or theoretical I am not sure—that he would go into a group of Hassidic Jews and say, “The Jews deserved the Holocaust.” Now I might do something like that but even I would need a good reason to not just push someone’s buttons but to stab said buttons with a knife and twist and turn until all that is left is a scrap of Jew-dough waiting for the oven. Just earlier he had told me that when he teaches he respects his students discomfort levels and doesn’t push them too far. I don’t know, telling a bunch of Hassid that millions of their brethren deserved to be gassed—seems like pushing a discomfort level to me, no?

We talked about how all these different swamis from India seemed to come to America and would very soon, despite having taken vows of celibacy, pull out their puds and push it into our American women. I told him regarding my beloved Osho that no matter how many things I have heard him accused of, I never heard of anything regarding him personally being involved in any sexually questionable behavior with any of his students. Sky told me he had. I don’t believe it, not because I am so enamored with Osho that I am ready to deny Truth over him but because, believe me, I’ve searched and didn’t even find a hint of it—anywhere. The many Osho bashers I’ve come across never said it.

He is apparently going to finish up a teaching program in January at Integral Yoga and I mentioned how Swami Satchidananda’s personal secretary said the swami was, shall we say, not following his celibacy vow. He justified that sometimes teachers need to do tantric stuff with their students in order to open them up to God knows what—I think just open their legs up really. I said, “She said when they travelled he forced her to give him blowjobs. Doesn’t sound too ‘tantric’ to me.”

I mean, even if they were doing it for the benefit of their students, which I doubt, I would think they would explain to them exactly what they were doing, such as, “Your upbringing has made you feel so guilty about sexuality that the only way I can see you opening to it is with your beloved guru.” Instead all I hear them saying is, “Bend over, bitch, and take it in the ass!” Sorry, but I’m not swallowing their spiritual jiz.

He told me how one of his students once felt like she had to sleep with him and when he told her that she didn’t, she was like, “Really? I don’t have to sleep with you?” Now if I had a girl that stupid in one of my classes, I probably would bang her and then kick her out of my class, telling her that I don’t like gullible whores in my class. But the way Sky told me this story, it made it seem like he was just so cool and had such charm that he mesmerized the girls in his class. I liked him and all but I just couldn’t see him charm anyone out of his or her panties. At one time I even took a break from our conversation just to tighten my chastity belt.

We got into a discussion of boundaries that were never to be crossed. He said something that I agree with in philosophy but in practice I have some questions. I said how even if I were starving in the desert with my dog, I would never eat her, that to me that would be such a betrayal to her, who looks to me for protection and affection. He said, “You don’t really know whether you might find yourself in a situation where you would eat her.” I mean, I suppose if I got hit on the head which stimulated a part in my brain that made me completely psychotic and the only thing that would calm my insanity was the fresh flesh of a dog, that perhaps I would eat my dog. But that’s like presenting to a vegan, “But what if you actually didn’t care about animals? Would you eat them then?”

I mean, I could say, “You don’t know that you wouldn’t kill someone for his iPod,” but brutha please! You do. I would choose to die before mortally harming my dog because I was hungry. If I were cold I’d her into gloves and a jacket in a minute. But that’s a different story altogether.

My teaching comes in the form not of workshops or lectures or books but in people mirroring behavior that I am too retarded to see in myself. I suppose the teaching in Sky was how even if I was somewhat sincere in my sharing and somewhat amusing in my storytelling, I had to watch coming off as arrogant, cocky prick.

When I got home it was late and there was nothing in the house to snack on. I looked over at my dog and all of a sudden I saw her legs as if they were firm, crisp carrots. I saw her tail as if it was a purplish-green leaf of kale with curls around the edges. I saw her body like a papaya, firm to the touch but rich and juicy on the inside. She looked up at me and said, “What the fuck are you looking at me like?” and I immediately snapped back to reality.

I decided it was best for both of us if I made sure to always keep my refrigerator stocked with food, as now that Sky had planted the dog-eating seed in my fragile little brain, my little girl wasn’t the only drooling animal in the house. Perhaps Sky could finagle me out of my panties. As he said, I really don’t know anything for certain.

The Man Behind The Curtain

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

Anyone who saw The Wizard of Oz could clearly make a distinction between the fierce and powerful Wizard projected onto the big screen and the soft, frail old man behind the curtain; you would almost have to be a moron to not be able to. When it comes to the “Swami X” projection, I find a lot of people making assumptions about the man behind the words and almost always these assumptions are wrong.

I had one girl come to her first yoga class with me after being an avid reader of my un-blog. After class she told me that her preconceived assessment of me was completely wrong. Seeing me in person, hearing the tones in the voice behind the words, and feeling the energy that projects beyond the physical body and seeing how I relate to my dog with total love and affection she said, “That was not the Swami X I had created in my mind.”

She told me she was expecting an arrogant, aggressive, dominating, mean, rude swami (why the hell she came to meet that asshole besides pure masochism I have no idea!) and instead found a softer, passionate, loving swami with a big heart. I had to warn her not to post anything about this on my un-blog or I would immediately lose my arrogant, aggressive, dominating, mean, rude asshole base of readers, which accounts for both of them.

While I can’t blame you for not fully knowing the man behind the costumed keyboard, I can point out that when you think you know this man based on a single foul-mouthed rant—you don’t. And while I could easily forgive ignorance, when it masquerades as intelligence it takes way too much effort on my part not to think you a complete moron.

I channel a certain “trickster” energy when I write most of these un-blog entries. This is like pulling the color red from the rainbow. While it is still rainbow energy and encompasses aspects of the full rainbow, it is only a small portion of the visible spectrum. Now if you are a red-loving gal, you’ll think it glorious. “What a beautiful depiction of color!” But if you are a green-loving guy, you will most probably offer your self-proclaimed expertise as one with a Doctorate in Hue-ology and, needless to say, your review won’t be a raving one. “I’ve scraped off my shoes better smelling pieces than this guy’s writing!”

Have you noticed that the poetry has a totally different feel? That is because the poetry is more full-spectrum rainbow energy and only the most hardened “Poetry’s for fags!” thug won’t be able to see the color in it.

When I am in “flow,” it doesn’t really matter to me what color is coming through—it’s all rainbow and it all feels good. It’s only afterwards when I hear some of the critique of not just the color—but of me—that I start to feel that I’m surrounded by a bunch of critical hacks who wouldn’t recognize art if Picasso painted it and Webster put a dictionary label underneath it.

Yes, it takes a discerning eye to see the whole rainbow in the red. I’m challenging you to open up to a broader vision, to see beyond what only your eyes show you. You focus on the scribbles that I use to get the pen ink flowing and miss the Einsteinian brilliance that is there for the taking—and then blame me for the ugliness of the scribble. It’s becoming harder for me to think you capable and even worthy of what I have shared with you. Perhaps you should bow down and kiss the earth that there are still people pulling down the rainbow for you when all you do is bitch about the rain.

For those as described above, I don’t want to share the man with you. Why would I? You don’t want to see a rainbow man—you want to make me a single color. It is typical of most to revel in pointing out the perceived flaws of others and by putting them down thinking that they are somehow greater. “Hey, at least I’m better than that guy!”

One of my pet peeves is to be misunderstood and since I often write in periodic hieroglyphic format, you can imagine that my pet store smells not of urine and feces, but of peevishness. So because of this terrible defecatory smell offending my nostrils, I will draw open the curtain…just a bit…and show you a little of the man behind it.

  • Besides esthetically, I am not attracted to the men—regardless of how many people on the street call me “Faggot!” [http://rebelyogi.com/faggot-4.html]. One person wrote me about how I am lower than the bacteria that feed on pond scum and his proof came in quoting a line I wrote from “Yoga Perv” [http://rebelyogi.com/yoga-perv.html] regarding what I did when the yoga perv joined up my Meet-Up group called Yoga Without Walls: After 10-minutes of staring at his profile picture, I decided I didn’t want to fuck him.” And besides, even if I was attracted to men, it wouldn’t take me 10-minutes to assess if I wanted to fuck one of them or not.
  • Contrary to what is often written, I don’t have a fetish about shoving things in my ass. I am not against this, per se, and have on occasion had my prostate stimulated to my liking, but I much prefer to stick my cucumbers, carrots and celery stalks into my juicer than into my ass.
  • I do not hate Jews, blacks, Hispanics, women or any other group of people. Well, maybe Christians. I have on multiple occasions bought women’s clothes because to me they were much flashier than the male counterpart and I am free from labels and fears. It is you, the cowards, who have allowed others to take away from you your full use of not only fashion but the English language, because you feel that if you say “fuck” your prick may fall off from Mormon guilt and if you say “nigger” you will forever be ostracized as “Nigger Guy” [“South Park” Season 11, Episode 1, “With Apologies To Jesse Jackson” (http://www.southparkstudios.com)]. I do not.
  • I am against all labels and identifications that separate. This goes for taking pride in being an “American,” “Guy with less melanin in his skin,” or “Man who is attracted to the opposite sex.” I was raised in a Jewish family and if someone today asked me if I was a Jew I would say no—not because I’d be ashamed to be associated with cheap, big-nosed freaks who want to take over the world but because I don’t want to be identified as belonging to any group. Only on occasion do I say, “I’m vegan” and this is solely to help the person who is preparing to make me dinner not to present me with a buffet of slaughter and wonder why I’m not eating anything. After seeing the phoniness of the yoga posers, I am even reluctant to call myself a yogi. My racist, sexist, homophobic and other derogatory comments regarding different groups is a mock on the stupid people who either believe in this kind of moronicy or think it’s noble to take pride in being a member of a group. In Annie Hall, Woody Allen said, I just don’t want to belong to any club that would have someone like me for a member?” I would change that to, “I don’t want to belong to any club that would take pride in being a club.”
  • I am not a “player” (womanizer to the less hip.) I have had my share of screwing around and had a decent time with a bunch of it and a less than cherry time with some of it, like the time in college when the jogging girl chewed on my bone like it was a turkey leg and she was a ravenous tiger. At this point I am not looking for sex without a deeper energetic/spiritual connection. I am not celibate, which means in “Catholic” a closet queer that sodomizes little boys, and am not against, per se, casual sex. I am just not looking for that. If it falls in my lap…who knows? I may just move my hips up and down.
  • As much as I write about “jerking-off” or “tossing-off” or “choking the chicken” or “launching the Enterprise into outer space so that it can shoot its lasers on Klingon vessels,” I haven’t masturbated in about eight months. While it’s true that there are two types of guys, those who masturbate and those who lie about it, in my ever-attempt to escape labeling and group identification, I have successfully managed to slip through the cracks. This is not to say that I don’t touch myself on occasion; I still take a piss once in awhile or change the shoulder that my huge schlong is resting on when my arm on that side starts to fall asleep. But I haven’t blown any loads from stroking it in approaching a year.
  • I am barely making my rent each month—I assure you I am not spending money on prostitutes.
  • I did not get blown at the Scientology headquarters, although if I did I bet it would probably be as lame as the cultists who sit around and either pretend to be happy or that they’re not as gay as Tom Cruise.
  • I didn’t endorse John “4 more years of Bush” McCain or Barack “Fake Change” Obama for President, despite writing pieces with those titles. While these pieces might not have illuminated any of my readers, by their personal comments it showed me how many people just read my titles.
  • I don’t claim to be perfect. I make mistakes almost daily. At times I exhibit behaviors that I would like to drop. I do not behave like a fairy tale saint—nor would I want to. Unlike many of you who just seek to find fault in others and blame the world for your stifled growth, I do self-reflect and work to see how I can be a better man every day and realize that I am the only one responsible for my suffering.

So you’ve seen a little of the ass of the man behind the curtain. Maybe just a little plumber’s crack. I’m guessing you’ll use these few splashes of color to claim you can see the rainbow again. I have held your sniveling hand long enough and won’t forgive your ignorance anymore. If I hear it again, I will contact my imaginary God and have him cast an imaginary judgment on you so that you’ll go to imaginary Hell. It’s possible you’ll see me there, as I take all my vacations in ImaginationLand. But if they hire one more Mexican, I swear I’m going to find another resort where to rest my tired mind.

“Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!”

but that’s where you stand

mesmerized by the show

of projected fiction

and as much as you say you want to know the Truth

to see who is running the show

all you want is the spectacle

and to be able to claim knowledge

of a man

thought to be a lightshow

the man behind the curtain

wants to be discovered

but hides from eyes so easily distracted

by nonsense

for his tears are real

not programmed projections

and he doubts you will embrace his weakness

as much as his strength

and he is both of these

seeking a home beyond the theater

of masks and polite banter

where a moment of anger

or upset

won’t overload the circuits

and cause the other

to seek stability

in false wizards

that only exist in dreams

Open My Heart

Monday, June 8th, 2009

© June 8, 2009

Open my heart

So I can hear the song

Not only in the loon that sings

But in the human that angers

Let me envelope their bitter cries

Until they stir my heart

            like young lover’s eyes

Father Sky

Sunday, June 7th, 2009

© June 7, 2009

Father Sky

spank me with your Thunderous Roar

bathe me in your Downpour

just remind me

when I’m scared and wet

and have temporarily forgotten

that you love me to the core

The King Of The Put-Down

Friday, June 5th, 2009

"You're momma's so fat..."

"You're momma's so fat..."

 

After he had agreed that I could give a lecture and teach a class at the Yoga & Raw Food Expo, Mark Becker started to get worried that I was going to start ripping all the old-time yoga and raw food “experts” a new one, as in asshole, and his feeling seemed to be that he was trying to develop a Kumbaya-singing choir over a bunch of people with buttocks that looked like Swiss cheese. I assured him that I wasn’t going to put anyone down. Of course it was a lie but it was the only way I could get in there and cause some yoga terrorism. It’s a good thing that the yamas, the ethical principles of yoga that includes satya or “truth,” don’t apply to me.

Autobiography of a Yogi by Paramahansa Yogananda was about a young Indian boy who left home to seek enlightenment and all his adventures, including the different people and teachers he met along the way. My favorite section of the book involves a pundit, one of the so-called “intellectuals” who are really just memorizers, who came to see his teacher. He started to talk on and on about all the holy books, from the Upanishads to the Vedas, the Old Testament to the New Testament, the Baghavad Gita to the Diamond Sutra.

After a long time, Yogananda’s teacher looked up, almost as if he hadn’t heard a thing the pundit had said and asked, “When are you going to start talking?”

The pundit was dumbfounded. “I’ve been quoting all of the holy books and the masters for the last half-hour!” he cried out.

“But what have you brought to the teachings? How have they affected you? How have you put them into practice in your life?” In rebel yogi terms, “You can memorize a bunch of words but you still don’t know shit!” In example, to quote “Jesus said, ‘Only one like a child will get into Heaven,’” is useless. How have you been like a child? How are you bringing that child-like innocence into your daily life? Without doing that work, it’s like quoting, “Master Health Guy said we should all drink a lot of water to be properly hydrated and to flush our body of toxins,” and then when asked how much water per day do you drink you respond, “Well, only a couple of eyedropperfuls.”

To put someone down follows the same principle. “Master Health Guy is really a jackass and doesn’t know shit.” What’s the use? Is it helping anyone better his own health goals? If it only serves to put someone down then it is as useless as quoting the Buddha’s secret to inner peace while you live your life a miserable, tense prick.

In my talk I did challenge some of the conclusions drawn from people big in the field of raw food and health. This was less because I thought their conclusions may b wrong but because I wanted to challenge each individual to think for himself and draw his own conclusions based on personal experience or intuition. For if you are a slave to the Dr. Medical’s slash, burn and poison philosophy or you are a slave to Master Health Guy’s superfoods philosophy—you are still a slave. Who cares if you have a view of the mountains past the cotton field?

Why is it bad to eat cooked food? Ask anyone whose read a raw food book or attended any lecture with a raw food “expert” and she will respond, “When you cook food above 112 degrees you destroy the enzymes in the food.” Bravo, you’ve parroted very well. Have you ever heard any health food expert say that the enzymes in the food are designed to break down the food itself and not to be used for the thousands of processes in which enzymes are involved in the body? And have you heard these experts tell you the obvious—that when you COOK food your pot or oven becomes essentially a second stomach where you have already started the BREAK DOWN of the food OUTSIDE of your body?

And even the health experts who advocate taking enzymes to replenish the depleted stores in the body—and there is much science behind what this can do—are recommending a much higher, concentrated dose of enzymes than you are going to get in a stalk of broccoli. I’m not saying that ingesting cooked food is good for the body; I think the most damaging thing cooking does is destroys the energetic life force of the food. I just think that we are human beings and not parrots and to repeat “Polly wants a cracker” doesn’t educate us or help our health in any way; it just keeps us in a small cage shitting on newspaper below, making us at best a cute parlor trick.

I have heard a couple of experts that I admire very much say that when you eat cooked food your body has an immune system response. The insinuated conclusion is that this is therefore bad for you. If you looked into my body after I had a weightlifting workout, you would see a body that is showing a stress reaction. Yet if the stress is not beyond the capacities of the body, the body will adapt to the stress and make changes in the form of bigger, stronger muscles with a better ability to handle the same stress in the future. As a Master Herbalist I know that the plants that have the most difficult environments, whether because of weather or bugs or competition, always have the highest medicinal constituents because they have adapted themselves to survive such stress. Once again, I am not saying eating cooked food is good for the body or what the body is designed to consume; what I am saying is that a conclusion that cooked food is bad for a person based on the fact that an immune system response occurs on ingestion is not scientific. Let’s leave the bad science for the medical and pharmaceutical industries.

Many in the raw food world are obsessed with blended drinks. How else could you eat the recommended five batches of spinach and kale and dandelion greens, oh my, per day but to put what would not only take all day to eat but would require the equivalent of a marathoner’s endurance for the jaw and a chess grandmaster’s mental strength to chew and swallow without subduing to complete insanity into an electrical whirling dervish and break it down into a green mush that can boastfully be called a “green soup”? How many of the experts tell you that a blender puts out 100 times more electromagnetic frequencies that a cel phone that is off and four times the amount produced by a jet engine? I have a VitaMix, which is a $400 blender that is so powerful that you can throw metal nails into and out will come a blended silver soup. Can you see how there is a chance that this may be like eating food under a power line—it tastes great but your testes can now only produce sperm that glows in the dark and has a tale that look like fusilli? Has ANY raw food expert shared this thought with you?

Or have any blender fanatics shared with you how chewing food not only exercises your teeth, jaw and all the muscles involved in chewing, but also stimulates the acupuncture meridians that are connected to each tooth? Or how when you chew your food, it starts to send information to help the body prepare for what your mouth is preparing to send down the chute? Let me guess: no.

For dinner tonight, my main course was a shake made with six bananas, a full bunch of dandelion greens and the water and meat from a young coconut. It was delish! But just how when I ate vegan cookies from the health food store, I would never pretend it  was “health food,” blended foods are designed for babies (not really, only breast milk is designed for babies until they cut their eye teeth) and geriatrics who have nothing in their mouths but gums and a tongue—great for giving blowjobs but not for biting into an apple.

You have to soak your nuts. Dr. Vivian Vetrano, a medical doctor and raw food expert says you don’t. So how can you repeat this “fact” with such certainty? Have you tried it both ways and noticed a difference in your body in how it digests the soaked nuts versus the dried ones? Unless they mean soaking your balls in some soapy water when they look as dirty as some freshly dug up potatoes, how can you “know” for sure that soaking your nuts will do anything but make them wet and wrinkly?

Instead of quoting the Gospels, it’s come to the point where I hear people quote the raw food “experts” as the word of God—never doing the personal research for themselves to make such a statement anything more valuable than, “Jesus said, uh, something about mustard seeds and how they’re, uh, good on salads or something.” So David Wolfe may say his Elements of Life company is not a multi-level marketing company but instead call it a “multi-opportunity growth” or some other bullshit, but calling a smokestack a tree doesn’t make a person who thinks for himself want to sit under it or take a big breath of its excretions and say, “Now that’s good air!”

The role of an educator, a Master, an expert, is to empower you—not to think for you. And it is our fault when we let our mouths open and close like a ventriloquist dummy and let the words of the experts appear to be generated from our own wooden minds.

On Sunday, I attended Mark Becker’s class on fine-tuning your asanas, the physical postures of yoga. If I had to summarize what Mark taught in a line it would be: “Unless your yoga teacher is giving you physical adjustments, then he is a bad teacher and you should find another.” In the yoga class I taught on Saturday night, I didn’t give a single adjustment to any of the students…yet they all voiced how much they not only enjoyed but also gained from my class, less so in just a physical way and more so in regards to applying the principles of yoga in their day-to-day life. It sounds like Mark was dishing out more put-downs than this badass rebel yogi, yet I’m the one on the yoga terrorist watch list.

On Sunday night, I was putting on my skates and getting to roll home from the New Yorker hotel and the Expo to my patiently waiting dog at home, who was probably feeling like she was playing the scene from “Mommy Dearest” where she had to pee and I was like, “Hold your water, Cybil!” and besides feeling the pain and angst of holding onto her pee, she didn’t know why they hell I was calling her “Cybil” when her name’s Abandon.

Mark Becker had passed by in a rush, as whenever you organize anything you are always in a hurry; when I pray to God he usually responds, “Can you hold onto that thought—I’ve got to be somewhere in 15-minutes!”

He asked me, “Did you like my class?”

I said yes and he responded with a word like, “Really?” which coming from someone who has studied with many heavy-hitters in the yoga world and has been teaching for three decades, this had the strange ring of insecurity. And it also made him humanwhich I liked.

I told him, “Yeah, I had a good time,” and he smiled and rushed on.

His class was more a “How To Teach Yoga” class than a workout. I had been hoping for a workout but I managed to stay in my peace and even met a nice girl named Stephanie. I could have responded, “Not really my bag, Mark. And after how you so clearly defined what makes a “good” teacher and what makes a “bad” teacher, if I weren’t so secure in my Self I would think I was a shitty teacher who had no place sharing what I have to offer with others.”

But I’m not a George Washington cherry tree fable and a slave to the truth, especially if it can not serve in sharing peace. If I was Georgie boy I would have told my father, “I came here and the cherry tree was just lying on its side. Strange, huh?” And I am also not the King of the Put-Down, despite my royal reputation. 

Critical Paul

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

It was Sunday at the Yoga & Raw Food Expo. I had given my talk on Friday, taught my class on Saturday, so now I had Sunday to not think about any personal responsibilities besides having a good time.

I decided to take the “Yoga For Two” class with Dedee Benrey. I knew Dedee from a health club where we both worked years ago and besides her email newsletter (which I usually just hit delete without really reading), I often see her at the expos where she always gives me a hug and hello. I enjoy the hug and usually amscray before she has a chance to ask me, “So what did you think of my last newsletter?”

In my piece, “The Pregnant Present,” I had imagined the girl who I had met at the New Life Expo in March and was certain was my soulmate until she dropped me like a used condom, joining me in this “Yoga For Two” class and it being a great yoga re-union. Apparently that story remained in the realm of “Imaginationland” and I was going solo in Yoga For Two. “Iceman, come in! Where the hell are you Iceman?”

I was a little late to class and when I walked in, Dedee announced to the class that we were friends, I was a yoga teacher and that I would assist in the class. Right from the start the Universe was letting me know, “This ain’t Imaginationland, bitch.” I helped Dedee in demonstrations and helped a few couples in some of the partner postures with their comfort and to explore variations.

Finally Dedee sent me off to pair with Paul. Paul seemed like a somewhat “serious” guy. His smile seemed forced and I got the sense that anything that didn’t fit into his plan on bettering himself he would consider a waste of time and that any references to “South Park” or “Family Guy” would probably be completely wasted on him.

The first position Paul and I did together was a double tree pose, where we were standing side to side on our straight inside legs and our outside legs were bent with their soles against the inside of the supporting leg’s thigh. Our inside arms were around each other and our outside hands came to center, palms touching. Slightly gay but I was alright with it. 

When we were done with the posture, Paul made a comment to me that he was surprised how off-balance I was. Rather than going to the immediate response of, “Well you’re a prick!” I decided to explore more, not only his question, but also which buttons of mine had been pressed.

“What are you implying with your question?” I responded, with enough lube applied to make my probing somewhat painless.

“Well, you’re a teacher, right?” [Rhetorical question, as Dedee had announced this already.]

“Yeah.” [Keep cool, Honey Bunny.]

“I thought you were like a yoga expert. I was just surprised that you seemed so off-balance.”

Rather then telling Paul that I was challenging myself with my eyes closed in the position and that the proprioreceptors have more difficulty stabilizing the body when the sensory information from the eyes is not engaged, I gave Paul a little schooling on just what the fuck yoga is.

“Paul, I never said I was an ‘expert’ on anything. Do I fall off-balance? Sure. But, to me, yoga is less about how beautiful your downward dog is or if you can balance on one foot without teetering. For me it is about awareness and finding your balance when someone or a situation upsets you outside of the classroom.”

In reflection, I was probably reminding myself of this lesson as much as Paul. I gave Paul a physical example. “Most end a yoga class feeling calm and relaxed and think they are now so spiritual and when the first person bumps into them—“ I hit Paul on the shoulder with an open palm, “—they fall apart and all their ‘calmness’ goes out the window. My teachings are more about applying yoga in the real world rather than just circus gymnastics.” Was there a touch of male bravado that enjoyed physically knocking the pencil-necked yogi? You bet your ass!

Paul seemed to get it but I still think he would have been more impressed if I did a handstand rather than stand up for myself with an equal calm strength. But he did push one of my buttons and while I was stuck with him for the rest of class, I decided to keep my physical body “Yoga-ing For Two” as my mental body self-reflected.

Clearly there was still some ego identification with the costume of “Yoga Teacher” and a perception of what that should entail and perhaps an insecurity that I wasn’t living up to this fiction. I am pretty cool with what I have to share and Who I Am but obviously there is still a little human frailty with its quiet voice in the back of my head opining who it thinks I should be and questioning whether I am worthy to rub shoulders with the already established “experts” in yoga, raw food and health. Interesting.

Paul had asked in an “innocent” enough way, but it still annoyed me. Why? Going back to what I just said, perhaps I thought it was invalidation from him of Who I Am and what I have to offer. And why should that matter—even if that was what he intended? This indicates that the little voice is not 100% secure. I much prefer the voice I hear daily that says, “KILL YOUR MOTHER! KILL YOUR MOTHER!” Perhaps it’s because I agree with that loud voice. Or maybe it’s because it didn’t come as a surprise, as it is clearly written on the drug insert that one possible side-effect is: Voices in your head telling you to kill your mother.

Another challenge for me to explore is why it is that I find it frustrating when people offer or behave in what I perceive at times to be an “less conscious” manner. Perhaps there is a touch of spiritual ego (“ego” in the common “thinks I’m hot stuff” way) that arrogantly sees myself as “better” than others. “How can he see yoga solely as standing in balance! How could he not know his comment could be considered insulting!”

No one is “better,” per se, just at different points in development. The “Marathon of Consciousness” is not a race and it is completely irrelevant whether you finish first or last, although it is true that the last one out has to close the door. Everyone finishes eventually, if not in this lifetime then the next. How can I work to keep my heart open even if I feel insulted? How can I stay in empathy and understanding?

I encourage you all to remember that life is a process not a destination. Many of us are on the boat to the beautiful tropical island and we choose to go to sleep, hoping to wake up when we suddenly “arrive.” We continue to ignore all the opportunities the boat has to offer, not just from horseshoes to shuffleboard, but in all the human interaction as well. Each situation that frustrates us, that gets our goat, that pisses us off—these are great opportunities to explore the yogic principle of svadhyaya, self-study.

I can guarantee that on your journey to your center you will come across many “Critical Pauls” who will push your buttons. Instead of being mad at them, or putting them down for wanting to take a nap on the Titanic when you want to shout at them, “If you go to sleep now you’ll never wake up!” bow your forehead to their feet and transmute any arrogance to humility as you thank them for making you aware of where your buttons still exist below the surface, helping you to reflect on how you are going to remove those buttons so that you can let your center overflow your periphery until it is a blessing poured graciously on all those with whom you meet.

 

REFLECTION:

What is it that others do that gets under your skin? Maybe how they talk, what they say, how they think they are “expert” on something and really don’t know shit…according to you. Why does this affect you, or said another way: Why do you let this affect you? If someone in front of you on the sidewalk throws their “Coke and a smile” on the ground when there’s a garbage can on every friggin’ corner, the sun will still rise and fall, the world will still revolve and—believe it or not—you can still be in peace.

MEDITATION:

Imagine yourself meeting someone for the first time and when they open their mouth what comes out you consider being some really ignorant shit. Imagine your typical reaction: “Are you a representative from the Morons Association or are you an unaffiliated idiot?” Now rewind the tape and imagine the same formerly challenging situation. Instead of focusing on the other, imagine yourself focusing on yourself. “Why is it that her words/actions bother me so much? What attachments is this showing me to be holding onto? What buttons of mine are being pushed and was I even aware I had those buttons? Is there a way for me to remove these buttons? If not now, when? If I don’t have the tools to remove them, what do I need to do to acquire these tools? Or do I want to keep them inside of me?” Silently thank the other for helping you to come into a place of more awareness, more understanding.I suggest you keep your “thanks” silent, as most won’t take, “Thanks for being such a moron. You really helped me figure some things out!” too kindly :) .

“Those who appear in your life—whether to help or to harm—are all given by God. Meet all of them with a peaceful heart, but with a warrior spirit. You will fail many times, but in failing you will learn, and in learning you’ll find your way. In the meantime, surrender to God’s will, to the life you were given, moment by moment.”

—Serafim from The Journeys of Socrates by Dan Millman (p.225)

 

 

 

The Short Of “Swami X”

Monday, June 1st, 2009

At the Yoga & Raw Food Expo this past weekend I was asked again why I took “Swami X” as my label of choice. I wrote a piece called “A Rose By Any Other Name—Would Be A Pretty Stupid Name” (http://rebelyogi.com/a-rose-by-any-other-name-would-be-a-pretty-stupid-name), which is available for your reading on my un-blog, where I tell the many stages of development of my name but while amusing, it is also about twenty pages and most who ask the question don’t want to put in the time to know the man behind the name, so I sure as hell can guess it won’t be worth it for them to read the piece behind the man behind the name. For the benefit of the lazy who care little for getting to know me, I will write the gist of the explanation of “Why Swami X?” here:

(1) The focus should not be about my label or my person but the teachings.

(2) Many on the so-called “spiritual” path drop their birth names and take up some cheesy Hindu-sounding name, such as Satyananda (“blissful truth”) or Yogananda (“blissful union”) or the one I have taken up, Asananda (“blissful ass”). Like what Swami Satchidananda of Integral Yoga said, I am an “Un-do,” meaning my “religion” is about removing all the identifications and other separatist crap that keep me from just BE-ing. I don’t want to pick up more bullshit with which to label my-Self, such as “ultimate bliss”—I want to drop it all and just reside as presence.

(3) It is a mock on all those fools who change their names as described in #2.

(4) I dig Malcolm X (see “The Brotherhood of X,” http://rebelyogi.com/the-brotherhood-of-x.html). He started by renunciating his family’s slave name but later dropped what became even more of an imposition—the racist belief system that others implanted in him that he came to realize was not Truth and no longer served him. For one who lived in an oppressive society that killed his father, forced his mother to have a mental breakdown and didn’t allow an exceptional black student to be whatever he wanted to be, he would not allow himself to be held down and proved that with heart and perseverance, the cream always rises to the top—even if the cream is not white. Near the end of his life, Malcolm X said how he had the balls to acknowledge that he didn’t really “know” where he stood on certain matters and was open to change. I admire the strength and power of this man whose life was untimely cut short, his willingness to seek Truth and positive change at all costs, to admit when he was wrong and didn’t know.

(5) It’s kind of mysterious :) .

(6) A swami is one who is committed to the path of self-discovery, wherever that may lead. Yes, I did go through a ritual in India in which I received the title, but I don’t need any organization, committee, government or person to validate my commitment to myself or my “worthiness” to wear any title I so choose.

(7) It allows me a distance from all those who I don’t want to bring closer to me. Most don’t want to know me but only want to add me as a notch to their belt of those who they can say they have “experienced.” While I have more recently been open to deeper friendships (see “Soul Family Barbeque,” http://rebelyogi.com/the-soul-family-barbeque), I find it draining to deal with a lot of the shallow idiots who want to leach my energy rather than grow their own and like the ability to disappear when the swami robes come off.

The more important question to ask is: Why do you want to know? Most of you just want to piss on someone and somehow “prove” him a fraud. We are in heaven when we hear of some celebrity getting caught in a scandal or losing their finances. This is typical “have-nots” being bitches because they don’t have.

One woman came to my first, by donation, “Yoga Without Walls” meet-up event. She was the only one who showed and I gave her an hour-and-a-half private yoga session where she gained a lot of useful information regarding her alignment issues which could potentially lead to injury as well as philosophy. She asked me my birth name and I told her—like I wrote in my profile on the site—it is not about me, it’s about the teachings. As a result, she removed herself from my group—despite all she gained. And she was a shrink! Which shows that the most fucked up usually seek to be around people whom they can claim to be a little less fucked up than.

Take what I have to give you. If you like the taste of it, why do you need to know the original label? It is not available in the stores so you can’t go and pick it up for your private use anyway. If you want to taste it some more, you can come to my next sharing and feast away; I won’t limit you from engorging yourself.

I rather you seek who YOU are beyond all your fake costumes than my label beneath the label—which is still not the essence contained in the jar which I offered you freely…but you were too busy reading labels to really taste me anyway.

THE SHORT OF “SWAMI X”:

-A joke, a costume, a mockery

-Dropping labels and conditioning and not picking up new ones

-Some inspiration from Malcolm X

-Provides a distance

-Only 3” but I know how to use it (but enough about my pocket knife)