Seeds Of Deception
© September 11, 2011
Today is the 10th Anniversary of the event that escalated the course of our government’s outward expression of disrespect of the civil liberties of the citizens it supposedly represents and the first bold cutting of the Constitution into paper dolls. Rather than go through point by point the inconsistencies in the government’s conspiracy fable on what occurred on that day, I am going to present a few ideas that may suggest that, like in the movie Inception, ideas that you think are your own have been carefully planted into your head. But unlike Inception, these ideas were planted while you were conscious, or as conscious as one of the human flock of farm animals can be.
I walked around today wearing my 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB T-shirt that I got from www.infowars.com, the home of the fat fear-mongering exaggerator Alex Jones. While I find some of his exaggerations to be downright lies, I do credit Alex’s documentary 9/11 The Road To Tyranny with pointing me further down the rabbit hole into which I had already dove headfirst.
Alex Jones. For once his hands are empty and not containing a megaphone or a hoagie.
One main objection to people thinking that 9/11 could be an inside job comes in the form of a question asked in a doubtful tone:
“So you think our government would kill 3000 of its own people?”
My answer to this query is an unequivocal, “Yes.” But their objection comes less from history and logic and more from their personal ethical and emotional system not being in alignment with the idea of killing for personal gain.
From Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho." Hitchcock, sounds like a porno version of Pin The Tail On The Donkey.
Unless you are a psycho, you would NOT kill 3000 of your own people for profit or power, or 3000 “other” people for that matter—unless they are Iraqis in which case you could discount them as people and kill over a million without batting an eyelash. What results is a tendency to extrapolate our ethical system into every aspect of our world—because otherwise it would be just too scary a place in which to live.
But the truth is there are people out there ranging the gamut of being willing to kill you for the spare change in your pocket to those who would take your life’s savings (can you say Bernie Madoff?) to slide the decimal point on their bank account balance a couple of places to the right. Let’s look at a couple of different industries to illustrate how some people and organizations would be willing to kill thousands if not millions for profit.
"That's right, kids, enjoy your run through the DDT spray. And remember, when you have kids with three heads, it had nothing to do with running through a poison mist."
DDT is a synthetic pesticide that was banned from use in the United States because it was toxic not just to insects but also to the environment and people. This didn’t stop Monsanto from selling it to Third World countries that didn’t have the same ban. They sold this poison knowing that it would harm humans—for profit. They chose the dollar over the lives and welfare of little brown and yellow people far away, despite their P.R. that said, “We have placed a high priority on helping the spearchuckers and slant-eyed throughout the world.”
The pharmaceutical companies are known to settle lawsuits individually, attaching a gag order on the recipient of any financial settlement. This keeps the groups of people who have been harmed by the drug of issue from finding out about the other people who have been harmed by it and thereby banding together for a class-action suit that could cost the drug company not only in payout but also by potentially shutting the drug down once and for all. The drug companies knowingly sell drugs that have serious side effects that harm way more people than is acceptable to keep their drugs remaining not a viable solution to a specific health ailment for victims of disease but a cash cow for their corporate pockets.
The only place I'd like to see all these douchebags faces would be the shooting range on my target!
I have seen in the papers on more than one occasion Republican politicians voicing their hope that our country will experience another 9/11-like attack because this would make the Democrats look weak and incompetent to deal with terrorism and in turn help the Republicans for the next round of elections. They are saying that they value party over country, that if thousands of people have to die for their House seat they will not be looking at the emotionally broken down families but at the polls.
Since I’m not a financial markets wiz, all the talk of stocks and subprime mortgages only serve to give me a headache. But, in a nutshell, my understanding of what happened during the subprime mortgage scandal was that douchebags were issuing mortgages at low-interest rates to people that really shouldn’t have been able to borrow such money and telling their buyers that the housing market was awesome when it wasn’t.
When the truth revealed itself, the interest rates on all these low mortgages shot through the roof and all the brokeback borrowers couldn’t make their payments on their loans and the mortgages went into default. This not only screwed individuals regarding their investments but also threw into question the soundness of U.S. credit and financial markets, which expanded concern beyond the borders of the United States. But those individuals and banks that made millions selling shit as Shinola didn’t care who suffered; as long as they made a buck they were shitting pretty.
"I'm too busy snipping my third testicle, son, to bother with your problems!" "Sorry to bother you, Mom."
If one looks into the research behind GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) you will find nothing other than Frankenscience, where the so-called scientist manipulates a gene, shoots the mutated genetic material into animals and plants and then hopes it somehow “takes”—and then humans are given this Frankenfood to eat! Just about every study regarding the safety of GMOs has concluded an overwhelming danger of ingesting these foods. Most of the test animals refused to eat the GMO feed and when forced to, most developed tumors and other health diseases.
Yet somehow, through the magic of backdoor meetings—and by “backdoor meetings” I mean the pharmaceutical companies and FDA officials engaging in anal sex—GMOs were passed for human consumption. Read Seeds of Deception by Jeffrey M. Smith for one of the best works on this topic. Buy his The GMO Trilogy which is a 3 disc set that will leave you no longer comfortable eating a salmon with a piece of broccoli growing out of its head.
The story of Aspartame is equally shocking. The test rats developed tumors but this was covered up and somehow the FDA approved this poison to be added to tons and tons of food products for human ingestion. Former Secretary of Defense under dummy George Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, was the CEO of the company that manufactured Aspartame. In general, if any evil is going on in the world, Donald Rumsfeld is involved in profiting from it. By fattening the citizen sheep on the evils of sugar, they happily walk up to the trough to suck down this chemical poison.
Another P.R. psy-op for Aspartame is playing on the “I can reduce my calories” mindset. This obsessive desire of Americans to reduce their calories while still being able to eat a trough worth of food may result in the cardboard industry boosting sales by announcing: CARDBOARD: THE NEW ZERO-CALORIE FOOD!
So why is it such a stretch to think that a select group of powerful government officials and behind the scenes elite wouldn’t play the same game that just about every corporation does? For power and/or money most will pay almost any price—not from their own pocket, of course.
The government has top experts who utilize many psychological means to keep you from even raising the question of government involvement in 9/11. They plant a seed in such a manner that when it grows you believe that it was you who came up with this idea.
One of the early news reports I saw after the 9/11 false flag operation included some “on the street” guy saying how he saw the plane crash into the building “And then, due to structural damage, the building fell.” Really? Since when does the random man on the street use terms like “structural damage”? At best he heard someone else, probably a government agent, spread this disinformation. At worst he was a government agent himself planting this seed so that you would find yourself at a future time arguing with “certainty” about “structural damage” and how this proves “beyond a shadow of a doubt” that 9/11 was carried out by 19 Muslim terrorists with box cutters and butter knives.
“But surely the newspapers would uncover this dubious conspiracy?”
When anti-Russian propaganda was at its highest in this country, the word Pravda, which was the name of the leading newspaper in Russia, became synonymous with “bullshit,” despite the word actually meaning “truth.” We pronounced the evil manipulation carried about by the Russians while we kidded ourselves that control of the media could only happen “over there” and not in a free country like ours. And while having a multitude of media sources does make media manipulation harder, at this point, about 5-7 players, including Rupert Murdock and Disney, control all the media outlets. And you thought Disney was just about making cartoon movies?
Why didn’t you read on the front of the newspapers the science of former BYU physics professor Steven Jones where he concluded that the signature of the military grade explosive thermite was found in the debris of the World Trade Towers that he studied under the microscope? He had to use debris collected from nearby building apartments, as the crime scene evidence in the form of the steel beams—in direct violation of established procedure—was immediately collected into big trucks and shipped to China to recycle, making a few career environmentalists jiz in their pants.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLnWf1sQkjY
Who's the rocket scientist who decided to call this a "black box"? Yeah, I'd feel comfortable stepping into one of his rockets!
For the first time in history, the indestructible “black boxes” (which are actually orange but apparently calling them “orange boxes” was a little gay for the Naming Committee) from the airplanes that record everything going on in the cockpit (which is where the pilot flies the plane and not a clever term for the vagina) were supposedly not found. How come if someone asked you about these boxes you would tow the party line that they weren’t found when they were? How come you don’t know that they were found by firefighters and concealed by the FBI? Is it possible that someone or group of someones is manipulating the information you claim to “know”?
Even my parents, who are total "The government says this strychnine is healthy for me so I will eat it" said this documentary raised some serious questions! I think they disowned me a week later.
In one of the best documentaries on the subject, Loose Change: Second Edition [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501], the filmmakers point out that in the so-called “confession video” by Osama Bin Laden he is seen writing with his right hand, while the FBI has him listed as a lefty, is wearing a gold ring on his hand, which is forbidden by his Muslim sect—not to mention the fact that the man in the video was fatter and had a wider nose than Bin Laden [See Osama Bin Lied To at http://rebelyogi.com/osama-bin-lied-to]. Why did we not hear this from the FBI who probably has the best analyzers in the business? “National Security” or manipulation?
“National security” was the reason given why EVERY SINGLE VIDEO of the supposed “plane” that crashed into the Pentagon was confiscated and never aired. We saw tons of video of the planes crashing into the World Trade Center buildings. How would seeing a video of a plane crashing into the Pentagon weaken our country?
The most pathetic follow-up to the non-existent Pentagon video airings exemplified how stupid and brainwashed the manipulators believe Americans to be, not just in understanding that at this point corporate media is totally bought and sold but in their ability to interpret what they see with their own eyes. In a classic Jedi mind trick, the media aired about four still photos of the supposed plane crash into the Pentagon. What they consisted of was only a fireball or two with no discernable indication of what caused the explosion. I remember seeing a news report where the government mouthpiece reporter concluded, “This will finally put to rest once and for all the argument from all those people who say that a plane didn’t crash into the Pentagon.” Based on…? Americans are so moronic that the reporter could have said the same line after showing a picture of a puppy. “Seeing that puppy, now I am certain that an airplane crashed into the Pentagon!”
One of the stills released by the government and thereafter the government's arm, the corporate media, as indiscriminate proof that a plane crashed into the Pentagon. Notice the date of the "security camera" footage says "Sep. 12, 2001". I think they explained this as, "Due to Australian being 14 hours ahead of D.C. time and that the company that makes the surveillance camera is from Australia--that explains it, right?"
Just about everyone I have argued with about 9/11 have blurted out, “But Bin Laden admitted to it!” Only on a fake video. Are you even aware that he denied involvement in the attacks of 9/11 later? I am not saying his word is worth shit but I am questioning HOW COME YOU DON’T KNOW HE DENIED THE ATTACKS? Is this not newsworthy? Because covering this information would risk adding poison to the fertilizer that is helping the manipulators seed to grow into a full-fledged plant in your head.
"He has a beard and is wearing a Popeye hat--arrest that man!"
Steel structured buildings NEVER collapsed due to fire because fire isn’t hot enough to melt steel. The argument that the sheeple will make—not based on their own understanding but on seeds of deception that have been planted in their heads—is The jet fuel made it reach temperatures that could melt steel.
Even if they were right on this point—which they are not—it could never approach the temperatures required to disintegrate steel, which is what is needed in a free fall collapse. Otherwise you will have resistance from the floors and other structures in the way. “The pancake theory explains this: one floor fell onto the next and caused a domino-like collapse.” Since no one outside a government paid lackey could come up with this retarded explanation, this is yet another seed of deception.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=718236659434732032
Yet, despite never before in history before 9/11 had fires brought down a steel structured building, the BBC and another news station reported the Solomon building, WTC Building 7, as having collapsed 20-minutes before it did, an almost bizarre report where Building 7 can actually be seen standing behind the reporter! Coincidentally, when Building 7 was actually going to collapse BBC lost the feed to their reporter. Where did they get this information? Is it possible that they were getting fed information from people in government?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdNEZVGIu04
A friend of mine said he had a structural engineering background and when I asked him how steel structured buildings could fall at free-fall speed without explosives he said how he couldn’t believe our government was involved in the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings. This raises the other main reason we miss the mark:
Most react and respond based on our emotions and not on logic.
I was perplexed that someone who prided himself on being into science provided me an answer that had about as much to do with science as Creationism Theory. I guess the over 1500 architects and engineers who have signed a petition saying that the laws of physics don’t take a vacation when the government wants them to are just “conspiracy theorists” [See Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth at http://www.ae911truth.org/]
Are you aware that NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) while concluding that fire brought down Building 7 also said that there was a low probability of this occurring? One telling sign of manipulated information was their response to the question about the use of explosives. NIST said that they didn’t see any signs of explosives. When a follow-up questioned asked if they looked into this possibility they said they did not! If you don’t look for the needle in the haystack you will never find it. Then stating, “I didn’t find any needle in the haystack” is a true statement, although somewhat incomplete on its own. It is not true to say, “There exists no needle in the haystack.” What happens, and the manipulators know this psychological tendency, the listener can easily turn “I didn’t find any needle” into “No needle is there.”
Another seed of deception:
“The 9/11 Committee was a thorough investigation into the crimes of 9/11 and their conclusion is reliable.”
The seed is that a so-called “committee” must be competent and cannot be manipulated. The 9/11 Committee did not answer over 70% of the questions posed by the victims’ family members. The 9/11 Committee didn’t even mention how Building 7—which was not hit by any airplane—fell. There are many other omissions and distortions [See The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions by David Ray Griffin available at http://www.amazon.com/11-Commission-Report-Omissions-Distortions/dp/1566565847, 10-minute video talk of his at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMUuHIuWtoU].
Thomas Kean, the Chairman of the 9/11 Commission, stated, “The 9/11 Committee was set up to fail.” Other members of the Committee have said that they were blocked in having access to important information. “A thorough investigation”? That’s about as ridiculous as Fox News calling byline of “Fair and balanced.”
Another big question that can be asked at MULTIPLE points during and after 9/11 is:
Why wasn’t standard protocol and LAW followed in response to the attacks and regarding preserving the crime scene and subsequent research?
This covers everything from shooting down planes that fly into forbidden airspace and don’t respond to attempts to contact, to destroying the crime scene to not following the protocols in place which would mandate exploring explosives, including thermite, if a building fire were to result in explosions and the destruction of a building. Why aren’t the news reporters—or you—asking these questions? Perhaps one of the most foolish seeds to accept into your garden, that “Our government wouldn’t lie to us,” has already grown into a big tree.
"WHO GOES THERE?"
If you had the job of protecting a farm and were told that if anyone steps on the farm you are to shoot them dead and someone ended up walking on the farm in plain view and robbing the farm and banging the farmer’s wife and then leaving without you firing a shot—don’t you think you would at minimum be questioned why you didn’t and at maximum be sodomized by the farmer’s inbred cousins?
The other way the manipulators work is to plant seeds to prevent any discussion or debate on the issue. George Bush’s first speech after sitting like a dummy in a school classroom struggling to read a kindergarten level book, included a line, “Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th.” That is called “nipping the bud before it turns into a flower.”
The very term “conspiracy theorist” has been manipulated to mean “kook.” A conspiracy merely means that two or more people plan something without the foreknowledge of others. Our history is replete with conspiracies and yet “We can’t tolerate any discussion of conspiracies.” Why not? Because with the tools of science and logic a “conspiracy theory” just might be turned into a “conspiracy fact.” Or it may be dismissed. Anyone seeking truth would welcome either conclusion.
"Hey there, neighbor. I have a way to relieve your headache once and for all."
If you believe that your brother is the ultimate in sweetness and the cops knock on your door and tell you that he just murdered the whole family next door, your immediate reaction will be, “That’s impossible!” But if your brother had murdered the next-door neighbors in every town you ever lived in since he was 8, you would probably be living in denial, or a big Tom Cruise fan, if you continued to spout, “That’s impossible!”
Our government has constantly lied to its people in order to get us into wars or manipulate public sentiment. One such incident occurred in 1964 in the Gulf of Tonkin when three North Korean torpedo boats attacked a U.S. destroyer, effectively pulling us into the war. The problem with the story was that it didn’t occur. [For a longer list of False Flag Operations you can go to: http://911review.com/articles/anon/false_flag_perations.html]
One page taken from Operation Northwoods.
In Operation Northwoods, presented by JFK’s Joint Chief of Staff Chair and traitor Lymon Lemnitzer, it was on the table to commit such atrocities as hijack one of our own commercial airlines and attack and kill U.S. citizens and fake it was done by the Cubans to get public sentiment against Cuba in order to bolster support to go to war with them. Thank God Kennedy shut this psychopathic plan down. This is proof in itself that at least one government official would consider killing Americans and blaming another country in order to fulfill an agenda.
When do you start questioning your government? Your news media? Your self? How many times does the government have to lie before you say, “You know what, you’re a liar!” We were told about Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) in Iraq as a pretext to go to war. Never found. We were then told it would be an in and out war that would be over as quickly as the cock in George Bush’s mouth blew its load while he was engaging in sodomy as part of his Skull & Bones initiation. Wasn’t. We were told “Mission complete.” Wasn’t. When the hell do you stand up and say, “Shut up now, you fuckin’ liars!”
You have been lied to and manipulated. The facts presented by the government that don’t add up are overwhelming and an independent investigation into the crimes of 9/11 needs to take place if we hope to get to any sense of truth and hold the criminals responsible accountable. But until you de-weed your brain from the seeds of deception that have been planted there and have grown to the point where they have affected your ability to think for yourself and question authority, no amount of facts and figures will convince you of anything, especially when there are so many distractions to keep you preoccupied, from football the Kardashians.
"Nothing is more important than stopping the war--HOLY CRAP, TAKE A LOOK AT THAT RACK!"
Lord Acton said, “Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” This statement is not 100% correct. One has to be corruptible in order for power to have that affect. Unfortunately so many people are corruptible that it almost seems that corruptibility is part of human nature. Corruptibility seems a basic requirement for anyone who would desire to go into politics. If we want to get to the truth, whether that is about the events of 9/11 or about Who We Are beyond the veils of character and corruptibility, we need to root out the seeds of deception that will only allow us to grow weeds and not lotus blossoms.
